Equipment Calibration and PO

Hello,

In our company we have used Cetec’s tools for both our tools and equipment. This helps us to keep track of where our equipment is and its maintenance/calibration needs.

But how are we going to create a PO for a tool/equipment as they do not have PRC codes?

We have thought to create a PRC code category for equipment and tools in order to be able to use them in POs. However, the problem with that is that we cannot keep track of their calibration/maintenance as there is not such an option for Parts.

Any suggestions on how to be able to keep track of our equipment calibration/maintenance dates but, at the same time, be able to create POs for those tools/equipment?

Kind Regards,
Michalis

@Michalis

Michalis,

Great question here about modeling tools/equipment with PRC codes or as Cetec tools. Let me do some testing and nail down our best practice recommendation and I will get back to you once I have an update.

-Cetec ERP Support

Great Question…I’m interested in a possible solution as well. Thanks!

Thank you @cetecerp30, I am looking forward for your suggestion.

@Michalis

Michalis,

You are absolutely spot-on about the features and limitations of both tools and PRCParts within Cetec. The short answer is we would recommend you do both.

You are absolutely right that the best way to track maintenance/calibration needs for tools and equipment within Cetec is by modeling them as Cetec tools. To add the ability to create POs for those same tools/equipment, we would recommend you go ahead and set up a non-inventory PRCPart for those items, just as you suggested. How to Create Non-Inventory Parts

This will allow you to both keep track of maintenance and create/receive POs. I’ve done some testing to make sure there are no drawbacks/issues for modeling this way.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions about this process.

-Cetec ERP Support

Thank you @cetecerp30,
I will try to implement this asap and let you know!

Kind Regards,
Michalis

Thank you @cetecerp30. I believe this is the only feasible solution, even though it takes more time. However, it works effectively.